Assertion S N 1 reaction is basically a solvolysis reaction. Reason Polar protic solvents help the substrate to ionise and by the way get involved in S N 1 reaction.

Question

Assertion S N 1 reaction is basically a solvolysis reaction. Reason Polar protic solvents help the substrate to ionise and by the way get involved in S N 1 reaction. (A) If both Assertion: and Reason: are true and the Reason: is the correct explanation of the Assertion: (B) If both Assertion: and Reason: are true but the Reason: is not the correct explanation of the Assertion: (C) If Assertion: is true but Reason: is false (D) If both Assertion: and Reason: are false

Tardigrade Admin · Accepted Answer

In SN 1 reaction, first the substrate gets ionised and then, the nucleophile attacks at the cation. To ionise a substrate, presence of polar protic solvent is necessary, thus S N 1 reactions are basically solvolysis reactions. Hence, Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion.

Q. Assertion $S_{N} 1$ reaction is basically a solvolysis reaction.
Reason Polar protic solvents help the substrate to ionise and by the way get involved in $S_{N} 1$ reaction.

If both Assertion: and Reason: are true and the Reason: is the correct explanation of the Assertion:

If both Assertion: and Reason: are true but the Reason: is not the correct explanation of the Assertion:

If Assertion: is true but Reason: is false

If both Assertion: and Reason: are false

In $S_{N} 1$ reaction, first the substrate gets ionised and then, the nucleophile attacks at the cation. To ionise a substrate, presence of polar protic solvent is necessary, thus $S_{N} 1$ reactions are basically solvolysis reactions.
Hence, Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion.

Q. Assertion SN​1 reaction is basically a solvolysis reaction. Reason Polar protic solvents help the substrate to ionise and by the way get involved in SN​1 reaction.